It concludes that the debate has greatly enriched the overall argument. The sociology of war is a subfield of sociology that focuses on the macro-level patterns of war making, how societies engage in warfare, the meaning that war has in society, and the relationship between state structure and war making.
(Department of Sociology and Political Science/Department of Geomatics. It argues that the obsession with the ‘newness’ of wars misses the point about the logic of new wars that there is a blurring of war and crime but it is important to address the political elements of new wars that, although the data should be used with caution, it does seem to offer support for some elements of the new war thesis and that the argument is indeed post-Clausewitzean because new wars are not ‘contests of wills’ but more similar to a mutual enterprise. Thatcher Not So Bad After All: How Relational Closeness Buffers the Association Between Relationship Conflict and Helpful and Deviant Group Behaviors, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 4, no.4 4 (Oct 2011): 277296. The discussion of major armed conflicts in the SIPRI Yearbook 2004 focused. It addresses four components of the debate: whether new wars are ‘new’ whether new wars are war or crime whether the data supports the claims about new wars and whether new wars are ‘post-Clausewitzean’. It argues that ‘new wars’ should be understood not as an empirical category but rather as a way of elucidating the logic of contemporary war that can offer both a research strategy and a guide to policy. Abstract This article reviews the literature on ‘new wars’.
0 kommentar(er)
